top of page

Key responsibles

In big pharma, it's usually easy to separate the different responsibilities: you have a lot of people in big organization charts to show the authorities how you solve the basic requirements of EU GMP Chapter 2.

But can we come up with a minimal design? what is the smallest number of personnel that can drive a pharma company in a compliant way? Let's discover this fun fact together :)


First let's review Section 2.5 together to determine the key responsibles:


'Senior Management should appoint [...] the head of Production, the head of Quality Control, and if at least one of these persons is not responsible for the duties described in Article 51 of Directive 2001/83/EC1 , [...] one, Qualified Person(s) designated for the purpose. [...] The heads of Production and Quality Control must be independent from each other.'


So our magical number is: 2 persons can successfully drive a pharma company.

OK, but what about the second-check, double-check, review, verification, etc.? Wouldn't you need 1-1 additional person for each 'department': Production and Quality?


The answer lies in an FDA guideline on Data integrity, hidden in an Q&A (Section III/4):


'[...] in the rare instance that the same person is required to hold the system administrator role and to be responsible for the content of the records, FDA suggests having a second person review settings and content. If second-person review is not possible, the Agency recommends that the person recheck settings and his or her own work.'


So - at least theoretically - we can confirm that a 2-person company can keep up GMP.



12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Chromatographic columns and their qualifications

We have mentioned earlier the importance of choosing and testing of the column when developing a chromatographic method. But what should be the routine process for qualifying a newly purchased column,

Comments


bottom of page